<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patch 1.71 Patch Notes</title>
	<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Buggo, a.k.a Allie Henze, Relic Community Manager.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: atve</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-122445</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-122445</guid>
					<description>Have been waiting for this kinda stuff for years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have been waiting for this kinda stuff for years
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gifts for girls</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-98438</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-98438</guid>
					<description>The quality of the info is what keeps me on this site, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the info is what keeps me on this site, thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rickymac</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8199</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8199</guid>
					<description>Thank you!  For the quick response.

You're a "Good Egg!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  For the quick response.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a &#8220;Good Egg!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Buggo</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8020</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8020</guid>
					<description>Hi Rickymac, it appears they may have a solution on RelicNews. :)

http://forums.relicnews.com/showthread.php?t=156370</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rickymac, it appears they may have a solution on RelicNews. <img src='http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://forums.relicnews.com/showthread.php?t=156370" rel="nofollow">http://forums.relicnews.com/showthread.php?t=156370</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rickymac</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8015</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-8015</guid>
					<description>Hey Buggo;
 I have found that my World builder exe file will not load after i downloaded the 1.71.0 Patch!  Is this the case with everyone?

Need to Know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Buggo;<br />
 I have found that my World builder exe file will not load after i downloaded the 1.71.0 Patch!  Is this the case with everyone?</p>
<p>Need to Know
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: z1ggy</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7901</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7901</guid>
					<description>nah its 2600+ amd athlon, which is 1.9 equivalent to pentium. sure im glad it runs because minumum spec are 2.0 but its getting worse with every patch :(

Philman thank you, i will try it. i should probably format computer too, might be soemthing with that. well tnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nah its 2600+ amd athlon, which is 1.9 equivalent to pentium. sure im glad it runs because minumum spec are 2.0 but its getting worse with every patch <img src='http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Philman thank you, i will try it. i should probably format computer too, might be soemthing with that. well tnx
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Philman</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7878</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7878</guid>
					<description>Hey ziggy......try forcing "v-Sync" off in your video cards control panel.

This problem is quite common, and has been mentioned in most of the COH tech support forums online.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ziggy&#8230;&#8230;try forcing &#8220;v-Sync&#8221; off in your video cards control panel.</p>
<p>This problem is quite common, and has been mentioned in most of the COH tech support forums online&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Skade</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7859</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7859</guid>
					<description>1.9Mhz? You can run CoH on a IBM PC-XT at 26 Frames? Congratulations, Relic ;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.9Mhz? You can run CoH on a IBM PC-XT at 26 Frames? Congratulations, Relic <img src='http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: z1ggy</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7857</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7857</guid>
					<description>im happy for the new patch. but again with new patch i get even lower frame rates than before.

i have 1.9 mhz cpu, with radeon 9600 and 1gb ram. now becaus eof this, i run the game on lowest settings possible. 800x600 resolution, every graphichal option on low or off, model detail on the lowest. in 1.5 patch when i bought the game i had 64 average fps, then it stayed the same in 1.51. with  1.6, 1.61 it droped to 50 average. when 1.7 came out, frame rates droped to 34 average. and now with 1.71 they dropped again, this time on 26 average. so.........

1 more patch and ill be unable to play the game. why is this happening? im sure its the patch thing, since i ran performance tests just before and after every patch. i gues i do need to buy new computer, but damn.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im happy for the new patch. but again with new patch i get even lower frame rates than before.</p>
<p>i have 1.9 mhz cpu, with radeon 9600 and 1gb ram. now becaus eof this, i run the game on lowest settings possible. 800&#215;600 resolution, every graphichal option on low or off, model detail on the lowest. in 1.5 patch when i bought the game i had 64 average fps, then it stayed the same in 1.51. with  1.6, 1.61 it droped to 50 average. when 1.7 came out, frame rates droped to 34 average. and now with 1.71 they dropped again, this time on 26 average. so&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>1 more patch and ill be unable to play the game. why is this happening? im sure its the patch thing, since i ran performance tests just before and after every patch. i gues i do need to buy new computer, but damn&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7851</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.relicrank.com/bloggo/2007/07/24/patch-171-patch-notes/#comment-7851</guid>
					<description>thanks buggo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks buggo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
